Posted: May 1st, 2024

The Rise of Online Hate Crimes and Extremist Content

The Rise of Online Hate Crimes and Extremist Content
Over the past decade, the internet and social media platforms have increasingly become conduits for the spread of hateful, harmful, and criminal content. From racist, sexist, and xenophobic slurs to incitements of violence and terrorism, extremist rhetoric that was once confined to fringe websites and private communications has found a vast new audience online. Unfortunately, real-world hate crimes have in many cases been linked to or even motivated by such digital discourse, necessitating action from technology companies, law enforcement, and policymakers to curb this growing threat.
Prevalence and Impact of Online Hate
Statistics from various studies illustrate the scope of the problem. According to a 2021 survey by the Anti-Defamation League, around 1 in 5 Americans report experiencing severe online harassment targeting their race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or other attributes (ADL, 2021). Reports of online hate crimes to police have also risen in recent years, with over 1,600 such offenses recorded in the UK alone in 2017-2018 according to Home Office data (Stop Hate UK, n.d.). Meanwhile, content analysis of social media posts finds spikes in hate speech correlate closely with real-world terrorist attacks, mass shootings, and hate crimes targeting minority groups (Forbes, 2023).
The psychological effects of online hate and harassment can mirror those of offline abuse, including increased stress, anxiety, and risk of self-harm. Its viral nature also allows malicious actors to rapidly recruit supporters and coordinate harmful activities in the real world. Tragic examples include the Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand, whose perpetrator live-streamed the attack and inspired copycats after posting a hate-filled manifesto online. Clearly, failing to curb extremism online enables it to spill deadly consequences into communities.
Monitoring and Removal Efforts
In response, technology companies have ramped up efforts to detect and delete terrorist propaganda, incitements to violence, and other prohibited content from their platforms. Automated filters and human moderators work to flag policy violations for review or removal. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others also aim to redirect users searching for extremist keywords to resources promoting alternative narratives. However, critics argue such measures still lack consistency and fall short of preventing determined extremists from continuing to organize and spread their message (CFR, 2022).
Complicating monitoring is the use of coded language, misspellings, and other tactics to evade detection. Deleted content also often reappears elsewhere or inspires derivative memes and narratives. Some experts thus advocate shifting focus from reactive takedowns toward proactive efforts at online counter-messaging and de-radicalizing susceptible audiences. Technology could also be leveraged to identify online behavior patterns predictive of real-world risks. With further research and resources, platforms may gain new tools to curb extremism before it manifests offline.
Legal Approaches and Challenges
When monitoring fails to prevent criminal plans or activities, legal prosecution remains an option. However, jurisdictional issues arise when offenses occur partially or entirely online and cross international borders. Prosecuting online hate speech also involves balancing free expression rights with public safety—a challenge considering extremist rhetoric may not qualify as a direct incitement to violence based on current laws (Comparitech, 2022).
Some jurisdictions have expanded their legal definitions of hate crimes and terrorist incitement to encompass online activity. Others propose new regulations to hold platforms accountable if they do not sufficiently police such content on their services. Yet civil liberties concerns remain regarding excessive policing of political views and the potential for censorship of non-violent dissent. As the boundary between digital and physical worlds continues to blur, innovative legal frameworks may be needed to curb online extremism while upholding democratic values online.
References
ADL. (2021). Online hate and harassment: The American experience 2021. https://www.adl.org/resources/report/online-hate-and-harassment-american-experience-2021
CFR. (2022). Hate speech on social media: Global comparisons. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hate-speech-social-media-global-comparisons
Comparitech. (2022). 20+ online hate crime statistics and facts for 2022. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/online-hate-crime-statistics/
Forbes. (2023). Real-world events drive increases in online hate speech, study finds. https://www.forbes.com/sites/anafaguy/2023/01/25/real-world-events-drive-increases-in-online-hate-speech-study-finds/
Stop Hate UK. (n.d.). Online hate crime. https://www.stophateuk.org/about-hate-crime/what-is-online-hate-crime/

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Masters Essays, PSYC, Psychology Assignment, Psychology Case Study, Psychology Dissertations