Posted: September 4th, 2023

Critical Issues in International Business Management BUS7B65

Assessment Brief 1
Critical Issues in International
Business Management
BUS7B65
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 1
Index
1. Module Details 2
2. Assessment Structure 2
3. Assessment 1 Details 2
3.1 Task 2
3.2 Submission requirements 4
4. Learning Outcomes for the assessment 4
Appendix 1: Extensions and Extenuating Circumstances 5
Appendix 2: Submission Checklist 6
Appendix 3: Declaration of Authorship 7
Appendix 4: Use of external editorial or proofreading services 9
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 2
1. Module Details
Module Name: Critical Issues in International Business
Management
Module Code: BUS7B65
Level 7
Credit Value 30
Module Leader: Dr Achila Amarasinghe
Academic Year 2022-23
2. Assessment Structure
Item of Assessment Portfolio: Individual Presentation and Reflective Account
Weighting This assessment is worth 60% of the module grade
Presentation Time The time limit for this assessment is 10min presentation, 5min
Q&A
Presentation Period Week Commencing Monday 20 March 2023
Acceptable Formats for
Submission Power Point
Word Limit 2500 words
Submission Deadline Monday 20 March 2023, 3pm
Acceptable Formats for
Submission Microsoft Word
Feedback and
Provisional Grade1
Feedback and provisional grades will normally be due 15
working days after the submission deadline
Please check announcements page in Canvas, for the resit/resubmission dates.
3. Assessment 1 Details
3.1 Task
Task 1: 10-minute Presentation + 5-minute Q&A (1,500 words equivalent)
1 The grade is provisional until confirmed by the relevant assessment board(s). Your work will be marked in
percentages. This is considered to deliver the most accurate and fair outcomes for students. Each assessment
that you undertake will be assessed using the common grading system. Information about the grading system can
be found in your Student Handbook, Section 13.
The Grade Criteria can be found in Appendix C of your Student Handbook.
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 3
Task 1:
The objective of the portfolio (4,000 words equivalent) is to present different views on the proposed
theme.
• Students are supposed to identify at least two “Critical Issues in the
Automotive and transportation industry that Affect International Businesses
in terms of Globalisation”. These can cover aspects such as changes in consumer
behaviour, trade agreements and free circulation of goods and services, political
regimes and international legislation, etc.
• This should be presented on a PowerPoint poster (see instructions/suggestions on
how to produce a poster that is available on canvas).
• You should also provide some valid examples to illustrate your identified issues.
• Each student will present his/her poster (10 minutes) followed by a Q&A (5
minutes).
• Poster presentations should be 1,500 words equivalent.
Task 2:
• Upon conclusion of the presentation, students will submit a reflective account (2,500
words) that reflects the work presented and the issues discussed and highlighted
during the research and production of the poster presentation.
This assessment carries 60% of the total weighting of the module. The assessment criteria used for
awarding marks on this assessment are presented below:
Criterion % of Mark
Quality of the identification of the contemporary critical business management
issues.
20%
Critical analysis of the contemporary critical business management issues from
a global perspective. 20%
Critical analysis and evaluation of the impact of critical issues on business
sustainability.
20%
Ability to develop appropriate and innovative responses to the challenges which
the issues present. 20%
Presentation and style 5%
Quality of Poster (creativity, visuals, clarity) 5%
Research evidence/ Use of Harvard referencing 10%
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 4
3.2 Submission requirements
You must submit your assignment by using the Turnitin gateway in the module’s Canvas site.
Please Note: When you submit you will be asked to confirm you have referred to the Submission
Checklist (see Appendix 2) and the act of submitting your work electronically will be taken as an
acceptance of the Declaration of Authorship (see Appendix 3 and Appendix 4). Wrexham Glyndŵr
University provides guidance for students on Academic Integrity and it is available through their own
Academic Integrity Portal.
If you are experiencing technical issues with submitting your work, you should notify your Module
Leader/Tutor and IT Services [itsupport@bil.ac.uk] by email before the submission deadline with a
copy of your work file attached. Your file will not be accepted if you do not do so.
3.2.1 Word Limits and Penalties for Excess Word Count
All written assignments include clear guidance on the maximum amount that should be written in order
to address the requirements of the assessment task (a ‘word limit’).
If the submission exceeds the word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to
and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the
item of assessment.
Abstracts, citations in footnotes, reference lists, bibliographies and appendices are excluded from any
word limit requirements.
In-text citations, embedded quotations, and all headings and titles are included in the word limit.
Where a submission is notably under the word limit, the full submission will be marked on the extent to
which the requirements of the assessment task have been met. Generally speaking, submissions under
the word limit fall short of the requirements of the assessment task.
The penalty for exceeding the word count will be 5 marks per 1,000 words excess (e.g. a 1,000 word
assignment would have 5 marks deducted if it were to be between 1,101 and 2,100 words, 10 marks
deducted for if it were to be between 2,101 and 3,100 words and so on).
4. Learning Outcomes for the assessment
This item of assessment covers the following learning outcomes. For the full list of learning outcomes
for the module, please refer to the Module Study Guide.
• Identify and critically analyse contemporary critical business management issues
from a global perspective.
• Critically analyse and evaluate the impact of critical issues on business sustainability
and develop appropriate responses to the challenges which the issues present
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 5
Appendix 1: Extensions and Extenuating Circumstances
Extensions cannot be granted for Presentations.
Information on extenuating circumstances can be found in the Student Handbook, Section 13.
Applications for extenuating circumstances, with supporting evidence (such as medical certificates)
should be made through the e-Vision portal.
Wrexham Glyndŵr University’s Extenuating Circumstances Policy document can be accessed through
our Quality and Enhancement Manual: QEM Section 3: All Policies and Procedures.
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 6
Appendix 2: Submission Checklist
1. Have you checked Canvas messages/announcements for any additional/final details of the
assessment?
2. Are you submitting in the correct submission area e.g., if it is a resubmission of your
second assignment it should be ‘AS2R’?
3. Make sure you are submitting the correct final version of your work.
4. Have you kept to the word limit? Remember, anything greater than 10% above the word
count will not be marked.
5. Have you addressed the assessment requirements as outlined in the Assessment Brief?
6. Have you spell checked and proofread your work?
7. Is your work formatted correctly and consistently?
8. Are you submitting a document in the correct format?
9. Is your work written in an appropriate academic style?
10. Have you checked your citations and Reference List/Bibliography?
11. Have you submitted your work through Turnitin to get a similarity report to check you have
paraphrased where required?
12. Have you read the Declaration of Authorship (Appendix 3)?
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 7
Appendix 3: Declaration of Authorship
By submitting this work electronically to Bloomsbury Institute and Wrexham Glyndŵr University, I
confirm that I have read and understood the Declaration and Definitions below:
Declaration of Authorship:
1. I hold a copy of this assignment which can be produced if the original is
lost/damaged.
2. This assignment is my original work and no part of it has been copied from any other
student’s work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement has
been made.
3. No part of this assignment has been written for me by any other person except where
such collaboration has been authorised in the Assessment Brief.
4. I have not previously submitted this work for any other course/module.
5. I have not submitted any work generated by Artificial Intelligence as my own, as this
will be considered as an academic integrity violation. This includes the use of
Artificial Intelligence to outline, write, create, or edit my assignment. e.g., work
generated by Artificial Intelligence including chatbots, language models and learning
algorithms.
6. Where applicable, I have included a declaration confirming external editorial or
proofreading services (see Appendix 3).
Definitions
I understand that:
1. Plagiarism is defined as using another person’s words or ideas without
acknowledgment and submitting them for assessment as if they were one’s own
work. This can include copying, translating from one language to another or
unacknowledged paraphrasing. It includes the use of quotations from the published
or unpublished work of other persons, whether from books, articles, the internet, or
any other format, when these quotations have not been acknowledged as such by
being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged. It can also include the use of
summaries of another person’s ideas, judgements, diagrams, graphs, drawings,
computer programmes, laboratory, or survey results without reference to that person
in the text and the source in the bibliography. Note: Wrexham Glyndŵr University
will not accept a lack of understanding of the requirements for acknowledging the
work of others as a legitimate defence for disregard of academic integrity.
2. Collusion is defined as work which has been undertaken by or with others but is
submitted solely as the work of one person. This can also apply when the work of
one person is submitted in the name of another. Where this is done with the
knowledge of the originator, both parties can be considered to be at fault. This
should not be confused with group working when clear advice will be provided on
what students are permitted to submit for assessment. Unless specifically advised
to the contrary, any work submitted for assessment should be that of the individual
and not that of a group.
3. Contract cheating/Commissioning includes any action whereby a third party
undertakes work on behalf of the student whether or not paid for by the student. The
definition of third party includes a fellow student, friend, or family member but where
it is another student, that student is also subject to action under this procedure.
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 8
4. Re-use of one’s own material (either in part or wholly) is where material has
previously been submitted in support of an application for academic credit, except
where this is appropriately referenced or where it is a resubmission of previously
failed work and has been authorised by the programme team.
5. Fabrication of data involves making false claims to have carried out experiments,
observations, interviews or other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting
dishonestly in any other way.
6. Failure to obtain appropriate permission to conduct research: this directly
relates to a student’s studies.
7. My completed assignment is submitted and checked for plagiarism through the use
of plagiarism detection software called Turnitin.
Please note: Submitting work which is not your own and/or cheating in exams can be considered as
fraud2 and handled in accordance with Wrexham Glyndŵr University‘s Academic Integrity and
Misconduct Policy. Penalties can include:
• Cancellation of the student’s marks in part or an instruction to the markers to ignore
any plagiarised text when marking.
• The reduction of the degree result by one class or the non-award of a distinction, as
appropriate.
• The disqualification of the student from future examinations (applicable to offences
occurring during examinations)
Further information on Academic Integrity can be found in your Student Handbook, Section 13.
2
If a student is suspected of commissioning (e.g., paying someone to write an assignment for them), this could be
classed as fraud under student disciplinary procedures, separate to academic misconduct procedures. If proven,
the consequences would be severe, including removal from their course of study.
Assessment Brief: BUS7B65 – 2022-23 Page 9
Appendix 4: Use of external editorial or proofreading
services
Wrexham Glyndŵr University ‘s Academic Integrity Guide for Students provides clear guidance on
the use of proof-readers to check your work. Please check the link in Section 2.
What you need to know:
1. You can ask your tutors or our Learning Enhancement (LEE) team lee@bil.ac.uk) for advice
and support on how to proof your work.
2. Proofreaders should not make live changes to your work. They should only indicate where
possible changes could be made.
3. A proofreader should not change the meaning of your work in any way.
4. If a proofreader’s comments or amendments do change the meaning of your work, this may
be deemed as academic misconduct.
5. If you do use a proofreader, you must declare this clearly when you submit your work. The
declaration should be on the first page (cover page) of your assignment.
Example declaration:
“A proofreader has helped me with this assignment. The proofreader was my
friend/name of proofreading service/a family member/other. I have kept a copy of
my original work with comments from the proofreader.”
For more information, please go to the Academic Integrity policy itself, which is available in the Quality
Enhancement Manual on our website.

What is the assessment brief for BUS7B65 – Critical Issues in International Business Management?

Module Details:

Module Name: Critical Issues in International Business Management
Module Code: BUS7B65
Level: 7
Credit Value: 30
Module Leader: Dr Achila Amarasinghe
Academic Year: 2022-23
Assessment Structure:

Item of Assessment: Portfolio: Individual Presentation and Reflective Account
Weighting: 60% of the module grade
Presentation Time: 10min presentation, 5min Q&A
Presentation Period: Week Commencing Monday 20 March 2023
Acceptable Formats for Submission: Power Point
Word Limit: 2500 words
Submission Deadline: Monday 20 March 2023, 3pm
Acceptable Formats for Submission: Microsoft Word
Feedback and Provisional Grade: Feedback and provisional grades will normally be due 15 working days after the submission deadline
Assessment Details:

Task 1: 10-minute Presentation + 5-minute Q&A (1500 words equivalent)
Task 2: Reflective Account (2500 words)
Criteria for Marking: Quality of the identification of the contemporary critical business management issues (20%), critical analysis of the contemporary critical business management issues from a global perspective (20%), critical analysis and evaluation of the impact of critical issues on business sustainability (20%), ability to develop appropriate and innovative responses to the challenges which the issues present (20%), presentation and style (5%), quality of Poster (creativity, visuals, clarity) (5%), research evidence/ Use of Harvard referencing (10%)
Appendix 1: Extensions and Extenuating Circumstances
Appendix 2: Submission Checklist
Appendix 3: Declaration of Authorship
Appendix 4: Use of external editorial or proofreading services

Order | Check Discount

Tags: #1 Assignment Help Online Service for Students in the USA, AI Plagiarism free essay writing tool, Australian best tutors, Can Someone Write My Assignment for Me, Do my essay assignment